2. Both of these reviews are about American Horror Story, and it's new season Freak Show. One of the articles praises the show, while the other degrades it and speaks down on it.
3. The positive interviewer sounds like an a fan of the show, as if they watch it and enjoy it, so their review might be biased. But, the negative reviewer was worse with including some of the bright side of things. He mostly pointed out the flaws of the show and not much light was shined on the good parts.
4. (a) In the negative article, one fact was: Jimmy Darling and his friends remain on high alert, because the freak is an endangered species in 1950s America. And one opinion was: It’s sloppy, but that’s to be expected from an episode of American Horror Story that tosses seven or eight of its proverbial chainsaws into the air without any noticeable concern for juggling them.
And one fact from the positive article: AMERICAN HORROR STORY is back for a fourth season, subtitled FREAK SHOW, with “Monsters Among Us,” airing this week. And opinion: For the most part, I really like “Monsters Among Us,” a cool story that intrigues and entices, but there are a couple of strange choices made.
5. I agree with the positive reviewer. He didn't just state how much he hates the show. He included the reasons why he liked it and also backed it up with harmless critiques. He was being honest, but at the same time he was promoting the good side of the show. I watch American Horror Story, and I don't think the serial killer bit is going dry because they change the motives as well as the type of person the killer is. It makes it much more interesting.
No comments:
Post a Comment